Metrics / Sharpe
Sharpe Ratio
4 min read · Metric
Excess return per unit of volatility, annualised. The most-quoted and most-misread number on a result card.
What it is
The Sharpe ratio measures how much return you earned per unit of volatility accepted, after netting out the risk-free rate. A Sharpe of 1.0 means one unit of excess return for every unit of return standard deviation — a rough sanity floor for systematic strategies.
Sharpe is a sample statistic, which is the source of most of its problems. Different sampling frequencies produce different Sharpes for the same equity curve; small samples produce wildly noisy Sharpes; non-normal returns make the number harder to interpret than it looks. See the Sharpe vs PSR vs DSR concept article for the deflated versions that fix these problems.
Formula
# Daily returns, annualised
sharpe = (mean(r_daily) - r_f_daily) / std(r_daily) * sqrt(252)
# Monthly returns, annualised
sharpe = (mean(r_monthly) - r_f_monthly) / std(r_monthly) * sqrt(12)
# r_f is the risk-free rate over the same periodThe sqrt(N) term annualises — it converts whatever the native sampling frequency is into the common annual unit. Without it, daily Sharpe and monthly Sharpe can't be compared.
Typical ranges
- SPY long-run: 0.4–0.6.
- Decent systematic strategy: 0.7–1.2 net of costs.
- Strong: 1.5–2.0 sustained over multi-year samples.
- Above 2.5 on short samples: almost certainly noise or selection bias. The same parameters won't hold up over longer windows.
- Above 4.0: a Renaissance-tier claim. Treat with extreme skepticism — usually look-ahead bias, capacity-limited HFT, or fitted to a brief regime.
Common mistakes
- Not annualising. Daily Sharpe of 0.07 sounds awful but annualises to 1.1 (×sqrt(252)). Always state whether the number is annualised.
- Comparing across frequencies. A strategy with great daily Sharpe and weak monthly Sharpe is harvesting short-horizon noise — the daily number flatters via mechanical aggregation.
- Ignoring skew and kurtosis. Two strategies with identical Sharpe but very different return distributions are very different bets. A negative-skew strategy with a 1.5 Sharpe blows up occasionally; a positive-skew 1.5 Sharpe is more comfortable.
What the platform flags
Quantis always shows Sharpe alongside PSR (probability the true Sharpe is > 0 given sample noise) and DSR (PSR adjusted for the candidate variants tested). On a small sample, a Sharpe of 1.5 with PSR 70% is much weaker evidence than the headline implies. The deflated versions are the trust pills, not the headline itself.
Further reading
- Sharpe vs PSR vs DSR → the noise-corrected and selection-corrected versions.
- Sortino → Sharpe's downside-only cousin.